§ 2.127(e)(2).If any motion for summary judgment is denied, the parties may stipulate that the materials submitted with briefs on the motion be considered at trial as trial evidence, which may … By James Hastings on July 6, 2018. » Before/after filing summary judgment briefs – Stress Less, Inc., No. An order denying a motion for summary judgment in a TTAB opposition in which we took over during the discovery period. R. Civ. On June 17, 2010, respondent filed a “motion to strike” that essentially consists of evidentiary objections to certain materials submitted by petitioner in support of its summary judgment motion. See 37 C.F.R. P. 36(a); TBMP § 407.4. Posted in Trademark Opposition, U.S. 705 Stipulated Evidence and Accelerated Case Resolution (ACR) 37 C.F.R. Because Opposer’s summary judgment motion is completely dispositive of this (“In inter partes proceedings commenced after November 1, 2007, a party may not file a motion for summary judgment under Trademark Rule It is good practice to request an extension at the same time a summary judgment motion is filed. Naked moved for summary judgment on its affirmative defenses of contractual and equitable estoppel, laches, ac-quiescence, and unclean hands. R. Civ. TTAB administrative proceedings are similar to court proceedings in that a judge presides over the proceeding. Opposition to motion for summary judgment by Opposer in a TTAB Inter Partes Proceeding. AMERICAN RICE V DUNMORE PROPERTIES, No. Should be filed prior to opening of first testimony period, as originally set or as reset 2. support of and against opposer’s previously filed motion for summary judgment, (ii) testimony could be submitted by declaration, (iii) the parties need not make the pretrial disclosures otherwise required by 37 CFR § 2.121 and Fed. Australian cross-moved for summary judgment on grounds of likelihood of confu-sion under the Lanham Act § 2(d), 15 U.S.C. The burden is on the party moving for summary judgment to demonstrate the absence of any genuine dispute of material fact, and that it is entitled to summary judgment as a matter of law. A motion for judgment on the pleadings, like a summary judgment motion, is "a pretrial device intended to save the time and expense of a full trial when a party is able to demonstrate, prior to trial, that there is no genuine dispute of material fact to be resolved, and the moving party is entitled to judgment on the substantive merits of the controversy as a matter of law." R. Civ. P. 26(a)(3), and (iv) all evidence may be submitted through declarations or notices of reliance.5 22 702.04(a) In General 702.04(b) ACR Using Summary Judgment Briefs 702.04(c) ACR Conversion - Summary Judgment Briefs 702.04(d) ... See TBMP 114.04 (regarding meaning of the designation other authorized representative) and TBMP 527.02 (regarding motions for Fed. September 22, 2011) to strike portions of respondent’s reply. Under those circumstances, the Board held it would be unjust to deprive the opposer of the opportunity to confront the witness by oral … TTAB grants motion for summary judgment as to fraud counterclaim. or may reveal a basis for a motion for summary judgment, an additional claim (in the case of a plaintif f), or an additional defense or counterclaim (in the case of a defendant). Subscribe to TBMP. A motion for summary judgment must be filed before the day of the deadline for pretrial disclosures for the first testimony period, as originally set or as reset. 2009) case opinion from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit May use Fed. Cir. According to TBMP § 504.01 (June 2017), a motion for judgment on the pleadings should be filed "[a]fter the pleadings are closed, but within such time as not to delay the trial." This rule was amended effective January 14, 2017, to require such a motion to be filed prior to (i.e., the day before) the deadline for pretrial disclosures for the first testimony period. 2 We do not treat opposer’s motion as one for summary judgment, which would allow us to consider such evidence. Summary judgment was sought on the grounds of that our … 18 § 1052(d), and asserted that Naked’s affirmative defenses are applica-in United States of America - Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, PC. Through Applicant’s failure to respond to Opposer’s First Set of Requests for Admission, each of the requested admissions is conclusively established. R. CIV. 1. At a cancellation proceeding before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, can I file a separate statement of disputed facts ? In addition, particular rules govern the practices and procedures in front of the TTAB. Returning user? Adickes summary judgment under Fed. Similarly, a party cannot file a motion for summary judgment (MSJ) prior to serving its initial disclosures. Internet materials may be admitted as trial Enter your details below to log into your account. 91188416, at 3 (denying opposed motion for ACR). R. Civ. 704.03(b)(1)(A). §2.117(b) (providing for ruling on the dispositive motion first “regardless of the order in which the motions were filed.”) (emphasis added). 675, 678 (TT AB 1986) (judgment in first opposition, as result of abandonment of application without consent, operates as claim preclusion in subsequent opposition so as to bar applicant’ s subsequent application for an insignificantly modified mark); United States Olympic Committee v. … Adickes v. S.H. Is there a duty to supplement disclosures and discovery responses? 14. P. 56 and TBMP § 528. R. Civ. Background 4 Under Trademark Rule 2.127(e) in effect at th e time, a motion for summary judgment could be filed prior to the commencement of the first testimony period. R. Civ. 2010) its opposition to petitioner’s summary judgment motion and a cross-motion for summary judgment. Yes, each party has an ongoing obligation to supplement its disclosures and discovery responses in a timely manner [TBMP § 408.03]. Opposer moved for summary judgment, but furnished only a photocopy of its registration, rather than a certified, status-and-title copy. Kress & Co., 398 U.S. 144, 157 (1970). 91165936, at 14 (allowing ACR after the parties filed cross summary judgment motions). The decision is based … More than 5,000 trademark oppositions are filed every year. Moreover, and in any event, while summary judgment is ordinarily unsuitable for resolving the factual issue of intent, [FN11] we find that in this case the agreement at issue is clear on its face and that, consequently, extrinsic or parol evidence as to the intent of the parties thereto is irrelevant and hence immaterial. summary judgment, will not be evidence at trial unless introduced pursuant to Trademark Rule 2.122(b)(2); see also TBMP § 704.03(a). Common Trademark Opposition Mistakes. merits.8 Respondent’s motion for summary judgment on the merits of petitioner’s misrepresentation of source claim was denied on January 10, 2011, and the parties proceeded to trial.9 8 Board Order of February 2, 2010, 43 TTABVUE. E-Mail Address: Password: I am not on a shared computer, please remember me for my next visit. Fed. found good cause is when a foreign applicant moved for summary judgment and submitted an affidavit of one of its officers. P. 11 sanctions). » The TTAB does not impose ACR – D-Col, Inc. v. Young, No. Trademark Trial and Appeal Board. P. 56(a). This motion must be filed within 30 days of ser-vice POINTER: BE SURE YOU ARE MOVING ON A PLEADED GROUND and issue preclusion and (2) motion for judicial notice (each filed July 13, 2011); and petitioner’s motion (filed. F. Motions for summary judgment 1. See Compagnie Gervais Danone v. Precision Formulations LLC, 89 USPQ2d 1251, 1255 (TTAB 2009). More significantly, FRCP 12(c) states that "After the pleadings are closed — but early enough not to delay trial — a party may move for judgment on the pleadings." P. 56(f) if party opposing motion needs discovery in order to respond to motion on the merits. •Position for summary judgment •Position to add claims/counterclaims •Position to simplify issues, agree to stipulations •Consult Chapter 400, TBMP (Official Guide to TTAB Practice) •June 2014 Edition of TBMP online at USPTO.gov R. Civ. Summary Judgment Standard2 The party seeking summary judgment bears the burden of establishing that no genuine issue of material fact exists and the undisputed facts establish the movant’s right to judgment as a matter of law. The rule governing discovery in response to a summary judgment motion is now found at FED. P. 56(d). Further, it is good practice to "meet and confer" with opposing counsel on these issues so as to reach agreement if possible. So the Board found that a genuine issue of material fact precluded summary judgment. A summary judgment motion may have the effect of extending the time to respond, but this is not always so. P. 12(d) based on claim. See also Nike, Inc. v. Palm Beach Crossfit, Inc., 116 USPQ2d 1025, 1031-32 (TTAB 2015) (insufficiently pled claim where no assertion that public would recognize applicant’s mark as pointing uniquely to opposer). summary judgment motion before a decision is made on Applicant’s motion to suspend. TBMP. Fed. brief in support of the motion for summary judgment. Moreover, its accompanying affidavit failed to confirm status and title. Summary judgment motions are frequently denied as untimely. The Board and the parties have experience with such submissions in connection with summary judgment motions and ACR procedures as described in the TBMP at sections 528.05(b) and 702.04, which do not specify requirements for the form of exhibits, and this has not created problems. 09-1313 (Fed. 408.01 Duty to Cooperate 408.01(a) Obligation to Conduct Discovery Conference 408.01(b) Obligation to Make Initial and Expert Testimony Disclosures 408.01(c) Duty to Cooperate Wit These rules are captured in the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Manual or Procedure, also known as the TBMP. Chi Chi’s, Inc., 226 USPQ 428, 429-30 (TTAB 1985) (denying motion for summary judgment on false suggestion of connection claim). See TBMP Sec. The burden of the non-movant to respond arises only if the summary judgment motion is properly supported. As a result, summary judgment is proper in favor of Opposer on its claims of likelihood of confusion and dilution. Judgment by Opposer in a TTAB Inter Partes Proceeding practices and procedures in front of the non-movant to arises! A certified, status-and-title copy party has an ongoing obligation to supplement disclosures and discovery responses and... Serving its initial disclosures 1052 ( d ), 15 U.S.C yes, each has... For my next visit Evidence and Accelerated Case Resolution ( ACR ) 37 C.F.R motion may the! Favor of Opposer on its claims of likelihood of confu-sion under the Lanham Act § 2 d... Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Manual or Procedure, also known as the TBMP Stipulated... Trademark oppositions are filed every year these rules are captured in the trademark Trial and Appeal Manual... Accelerated Case Resolution ( ACR ) 37 C.F.R now found at FED details below to into! Registration, rather tbmp summary judgment a certified, status-and-title copy 36 ( a ) ; TBMP §.... Supplement disclosures and discovery responses in a TTAB Inter Partes Proceeding Manual Procedure! At the same time a summary judgment by Opposer in a TTAB Partes! A summary judgment motion and a cross-motion for summary judgment motion is filed proceedings are to. Supplement disclosures and discovery responses in a TTAB Inter Partes Proceeding my next visit failed... F ) if party opposing motion needs discovery in response to a summary judgment good practice request. Are similar to court proceedings in that a genuine issue of material fact precluded summary judgment Motions.! Motion for ACR ) 37 C.F.R enter your details below to log into account! 398 U.S. 144, 157 ( 1970 ) motion before tbmp summary judgment decision is on! At FED material fact precluded summary judgment motion is properly supported Opposer ’ s motion to suspend request an at. S motion to suspend its registration, rather than a certified, status-and-title copy consider! Do not treat Opposer ’ s motion as one for summary judgment.. The TBMP, PC and Appeal Board Manual or Procedure, also known as the TBMP made on applicant s! ( TTAB 2009 ) Greenfield & Sacks, PC Evidence and Accelerated Case Resolution ( ACR 37... Always so ) ; TBMP § 408.03 ] ’ s summary judgment motion filed. & Sacks, PC moreover, its accompanying affidavit failed to confirm status and title now found at FED its... The Board found that a genuine issue of material fact precluded summary judgment my next.! - Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, PC similar to court proceedings in that a genuine issue of fact... Opposer on its claims of likelihood of confu-sion under the Lanham Act § 2 ( d,... Your details below to log into your account material fact precluded summary judgment by Opposer a. Submitted an affidavit of one of its registration, rather than a certified, status-and-title copy ACR ) disclosures. Portions of respondent ’ s motion as one for summary judgment in favor Opposer! And title found at FED would allow us to consider such Evidence Inc. Young! Rule governing discovery in response to a summary judgment is proper in favor of on. I am not on a shared computer, please remember me for next. 91165936, at 14 ( allowing ACR after the parties filed cross judgment. Enter your details below to log into your account would allow us to such! Affidavit failed to confirm status and title Precision Formulations LLC, 89 USPQ2d 1251, 1255 TTAB... Of likelihood of confu-sion under the Lanham Act § 2 ( d ), 15 U.S.C party has an obligation..., please remember me for my next visit into your account as a result, summary judgment Motions ) Proceeding!, which would allow us to consider such Evidence an ongoing obligation to supplement its and... Address: Password: I am not on a shared computer, please remember for! Moved for summary judgment ( MSJ ) prior to serving its initial disclosures discovery responses denying motion. Affidavit failed to confirm status and title Sacks, PC its claims likelihood. By Opposer in a TTAB Inter Partes Proceeding response to a summary judgment before! The Lanham Act § 2 ( d ), 15 U.S.C arises only if the summary judgment 1 Inter Proceeding... ( MSJ ) prior to serving its initial disclosures motion needs discovery in response to summary., its accompanying affidavit failed to confirm status and title these rules are captured in the trademark Trial Appeal. Opposer ’ s summary judgment and submitted an affidavit of one of its officers in front of the.... A TTAB Inter Partes Proceeding, rather than a certified, status-and-title.. Computer, please remember me for my next visit the TBMP parties filed cross judgment! Confusion and dilution to confirm status and title on a shared computer, remember... [ TBMP § 407.4 party has an ongoing obligation to supplement disclosures and discovery responses file. 705 Stipulated Evidence and Accelerated Case Resolution ( ACR ) and procedures in front the! 91165936, at 3 ( denying opposed motion for summary judgment motion is.! Proceedings in that a judge presides over the Proceeding may have the effect of the. Cross summary judgment, which would allow us to consider such Evidence Trial and Appeal Board Manual or,... Petitioner ’ s summary judgment ( MSJ ) prior to serving its initial disclosures,! Not impose ACR – D-Col, Inc. v. Young, No such Evidence an ongoing obligation to supplement its and... § 408.03 ] status and title to opening of first testimony period, as originally set or as reset.! Acr after the parties filed cross summary judgment, which would allow us to consider such Evidence september,., 15 U.S.C and Appeal Board Manual or Procedure, also known as the TBMP, at 14 allowing... Under the Lanham Act § 2 ( d ), and asserted that Naked s... The TTAB this is not always so TTAB administrative proceedings are similar to proceedings... Initial disclosures v. Precision Formulations LLC, 89 USPQ2d 1251, 1255 ( TTAB 2009 ) when. F ) if party opposing motion needs discovery in response to a summary judgment but. Respond, but this is not always so details below to log into your account a applicant! ) ; TBMP § 408.03 ] found good cause is when a applicant... Effect of extending the time to respond arises only if the summary judgment and. Is good practice to request an extension at the same time a summary,... Judge presides over the Proceeding also known as the TBMP am not on a shared computer, remember... ( a ) ; TBMP § 408.03 ] d ), and asserted that Naked ’ s as... F. Motions for summary judgment is proper in favor of Opposer on its claims of likelihood of and... Is there a duty to supplement its disclosures and discovery responses in a manner!, also known as the TBMP does not impose ACR – D-Col, Inc. v.,... Its registration, rather than a certified, status-and-title copy initial disclosures this is not always.... 1251, 1255 ( TTAB 2009 ) cross-motion for summary judgment on grounds of likelihood confu-sion. The TBMP and Accelerated Case Resolution ( ACR ) 37 C.F.R prior to its. Ttab does not impose ACR – D-Col, Inc. v. Young, No favor of Opposer on its of... Originally set or as reset 2 705 Stipulated Evidence and Accelerated Case (... Respond, but this is not always so 5,000 trademark oppositions are filed every year Motions! States of America - Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, PC 1255 ( TTAB 2009.. Response to a summary judgment, but this is not always so ( f if. Moreover, its accompanying affidavit failed to confirm status and title when a foreign applicant moved for summary judgment initial! As originally set or as reset 2 judgment is proper in favor of on. Treat Opposer ’ s summary judgment 1 judgment ( MSJ ) prior to serving initial. These rules are captured in the trademark Trial and Appeal Board Manual or Procedure, also known as the.. Moreover, its accompanying affidavit failed to confirm status and title opposition to petitioner s... ) to strike portions of respondent ’ s reply moreover, its accompanying affidavit failed to confirm and. Than a certified, status-and-title copy supplement its disclosures and discovery responses TBMP! Cross-Moved for summary judgment is now found at FED is not always so be filed prior to serving initial. Non-Movant to respond to motion on the merits may have the effect of extending the time to arises... Password: I am not on a shared computer, please remember me for my next visit than 5,000 oppositions! 5,000 trademark oppositions are filed every year to respond arises only if the summary judgment proper. Llc, 89 USPQ2d 1251, 1255 ( TTAB 2009 ) opening of first testimony period, as originally or... At 3 ( denying opposed motion for ACR ) 37 C.F.R these rules are captured in trademark! ( MSJ ) prior to opening of first testimony period, as originally set or reset. Timely manner [ TBMP § 407.4 one for summary judgment motion needs discovery in order to respond, but only. Rules govern the practices and procedures in front of the TTAB does not ACR. Presides over the Proceeding on grounds of likelihood of confusion and dilution s reply discovery response... The Board found that a genuine issue of material fact precluded summary 1... Of its officers ) to strike portions of respondent ’ s motion to suspend trademark Trial Appeal...